AstroShop Support Resources Education Events Publications Membership News About Us Home
The Astronomical Society of the Pacific

 

   home > education > resources

SEARCH ASP SITE:
 

Education Topics:

 

Programs

 

Activities

 

Resources

 
  The Universe in
the Classroom
 
    Articles on
Education from Mercury
Magazine
 
    Other Articles on Education  
  Selected Topical Bibliographies  
      Astronomy Education Bibliography  
      Environmental Issues and Astronomy  
      Women in Astronomy  
      Astronomical Pseudo-Science  
      Moon Resource Guide  
      Science Fiction with Good Astronomy  
      SETI Messages Bibliography  
      Astronomy of Many Cultures Resource Guide  
      Galileo: The Man and His Science  
      Black Holes: An Introductory Resource List  
    Weblinks for
Teaching
Introductory
College
Astronomy
 
    Astronomy Education Review  
    Space Science Education Resource Directory  
 
 
 

Contact Us

 

Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List

 

9. Astronomical Aspects of Creationism and Intelligent Design

Fundamentalist religious thinkers (from a number of religions) have sought to deny the evidence from geology, astronomy, and evolutionary biology about the age and gradual development of the universe, the Earth, and its life-forms. (Recent creationist tactics have involved attacking the Big Bang theory and radioactive dating, for example.) Some groups have worked hard to get their own brand of "creation science" or "intelligent design" into the public schools and to undermine the teaching of evolution, one of the most fundamental and best-established ideas in modern science. The literature examining this controversy is enormous; the list below is merely a representative sampling, of particular interest to astronomy educators.

An Ancient Universe: How Astronomers Know the Vast Scale of Cosmic Time: (from the Education Board of the American Astronomical Society)
http://www.aas.org/education/ancientuniverse.html

National Center for Science Education: Best web site for keeping up with issues in this area, with many articles, resources, and links.
http://www.ncseweb.org

Scott, Eugenie Evolution Versus Creationism, 2nd ed. 2009, University of California Press. Excellent introduction to the key issues -- scientific and political.

Bobrowsky, M. "Teaching Evolutionary Processes to Skeptical Students" in Physics Teacher, Dec. 2000, p. 565. Includes a list of creationist arguments and science teacher responses.

Bobrowsky, M. "Dealing with Disbelieving Students on Issues of Evolutionary Processes & Long Time Scales" Astronomy Education Review, vol. 4, #1, pp. 95:
http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2005007

Morrison, D. "Only a Theory: Framing the Evolution/Creation Issue" in Skeptical Inquirer, Nov/Dec. 2005, p. 37. An astronomer comments on how scientists are ceding the field by not noting the use of language. (On the web at: http://www.csicop.org/si/show/only_a_theory_framing_the_evolution_creation_issue/)

Hameed, S. "Bracing for Islamic Creationism" in Science, vol. 322, p. 1637 (12 Dec 2008). An astronomer warns of the rise of creationist ideas in Muslim countries and the need for education.

Talk.Origins Archive: (full of resources, discussions, links)
http://www.talkorigins.org

Supernovae, Supernova Remnants, and Young Earth Creationism by Dave Moore: (How creationists misuse arguments about exploding stars.)
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/supernova/

Lawson, Kristan Darwin and Evolution for Kids. 2005, Chicago Review Press. An introduction to Darwin’s life and key evolutionary idea, with a discussion of why creationist ideas are wrong.

Pigliucci, Massimo Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. 2002, Sinauer Associates. A biologist gives the history of, explains, and refutes the various "brands" of creationism.

Strahler, Arthur Science and Earth History: The Evolution / Creation Controversy. 1987, Prometheus Books. A discussion from the geologist's point of view, with lots of information about dating the Earth's rocks.

Brush, S. "Finding the Age of the Earth by Physics or by Faith?" in Journal of Geological Education, 1982, vol. 30, pp. 34-58.

Coyne, J. "The Faith That Dare Not Speak its Name: The Case Against Intelligent Design" in The New Republic, Aug. 22/29, 2005 issue (vol. 233, issue 4727/8, p. 21.) Superb layperson’s introduction to the history/politics of intelligent design and a refutation of its arguments (by a biologist.)

Dutch, S. "A Critique of Creationist Cosmology" in Journal of Geological Education, 1982, vol. 30, p. 27.

Wilson, M. "Geology Confronts Creationism: An Undergraduate Science Curriculum" in Skeptical Inquirer, Jan/Feb. 2002, p. 52. A course for geology majors.

The Age of the Earth: This useful page from the Talk.Origins site describes how we measure the age of our planet and then dissects some of the common creationist arguments for a younger Earth.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html

Changing Speed of Light Analysis: Addresses the creationist idea that the age of the universe could be a lot less than astronomers think if the speed of light has been getting a lot slower with time, so that light from distant objects wouldn’t have had to leave them so long ago.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/c-decay.html
A more technical site is:
http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/cdecay/

table of contents

10. The "Great Moon Hoax": Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?

A small group of "true believers" who claim that NASA never landed on the Moon got a big boost in 2001, when Fox network broadcast a long paranoid show about their ideas. The web sites below provide a skeptical examination of this claim and the so-called evidence for it. From the many moon rocks brought back by the astronauts to the instruments they left on the Moon, there was always ample evidence that the moon landings actually happened. But in 2009, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter took direct images showing the Apollo artifacts on the Moon, settling the issue for all except the most fervent "believers."

Phil Plait’s response to "Moon Hoax":
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

Hoax Comments by astronomer Jim Scotti:
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

Science at NASA discussion of hoax:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23Feb_2.htm

Moon Base Clavius Site (a group effort at debunking) [note that you need to click on the small arrows at the bottom to get to the next pages]:
http://www.clavius.org/site.html

Keel, W. "The Earth and Stars in the Lunar Sky" in Skeptical Inquirer, Jul/Aug. 2007, p. 47. The ultraviolet camera on Apollo 16 did record stars in the lunar sky and you can even identify them.

Plait, Phil "Apalled at Apollo" Chapter 17 of Bad Astronomy. 2002, Wiley. Good ammunition for debunking the notion that NASA never went to the Moon point by point.

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Images:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

table of contents

 
 
<< previous page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |next page >>

home | about us | news | membership | publications

events | education | resources | support | astroshop | search


Privacy & Legal Statements | Site Index | Contact Us

Copyright ©2001-2012 Astronomical Society of the Pacific