Publications Topics:

Books

ASP Conference Series

Monograph Publications

IAU Publications

Books of Note

Purchase through the AstroShop

Journals

Publications of the ASP (PASP)

Magazines

Mercury Magazine

Archive

Guidelines for Authors

Order Mercury Issues

Mercury Advertising Rates

Newletters

The Universe in the Classroom

ASP E-mail Newsletters

Special Features

Astronomy Beat

Contact Us

Mercury, November/December 2005 Table of Contents

Courtesy of the AIP.

by Andrew Willey

Much as we might like to think we understand something of the nature of the Universe, we actually confront a profound universal mystery. At present, the very set of laws we have created to describe it—the so-called Standard Model—suggests that the Universe, or at least its contents, should not exist.

From its Big Bang beginning, the Universe was filled completely with energy. When this energy cooled as the Universe expanded, matter condensed out of the chaotic soup to form galaxies, stars, and eventually our own planet Earth. Current theories of charge conservation and pair production, however, insist that for every piece of ordinary matter created in the Big Bang, there must be an equal and opposite amount of antimatter. And, as every fan of Star Trek knows, exposing matter to antimatter results in the destruction of both and, consequently, the release of tremendous amounts of raw energy.

Thus, according to the vaunted Standard Model, our Universe should have been a stillborn one, each new matter particle quickly annihilating its antimatter opposite, but even a quick glance around is enough to prove that this is not the case. So what happened to all this antimatter?

If you enjoyed this excerpt from a feature article and would like to receive our bi-monthly Mercury magazine, we invite you to join the ASP and receive 6 issues a year.