|
Mercury
Winter 2007 Table of Contents

For
more than seven decades, remote Pluto was counted among the planetary
canon. In August 2006, however, this world was effectively reclassified
with the adoption of a new definition of "planet." Opinion
among astronomers for and against this new definition is now regularly
slung about, and there is anticipation of a coming showdown -- between,
on the one side, those who favor retaining Pluto's planetary status
and revisiting the new definition of "planet," and, on
the other side, those who advocate for the new definition in the
midst of a burgeoning number of recently discovered planetary bodies
in the Solar System.
Here, two noted
astronomers share their opinions on the issue.
Who Defines a Planet? by David A. Weintraub
and The "Pluto" Question by Brian Marsden.
If
you enjoyed this excerpt from a feature article and would
like to receive our quarterly Mercury magazine, we invite you to
join the ASP and receive
4 issues a year.
|
|